Thanks to @legalwritinged, I learned about this post on Porter Wright’s blog Employment Law Reporter. It’s about the recent opinion of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in Alloy Bellows & Precision Welding, Inc. v. Jason Cole, No. 1:15CV494, 2016 WL 1618108, at *1 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 22, 2016) (PDF here). The Opinion Cole worked for … Read More
I regret to report the sudden and unexpected demise of one of the categories of contract language, namely language of belief. Well, I don’t really regret it. In fact, I’m relieved. Language of belief was a scrawny, frail creature who stood around not doing much of anything other than picking its nose, gazing into space, and getting in the way … Read More
Although way back in 2008 I wrote about complete and accurate (here), yesterday I realized that I hadn’t written about use of completely as rhetorical emphasis. So I exhumed the following corpses from EDGAR: In addition, all financial data must be completely and accurately recorded in compliance with applicable law and Invesco’s accounting policies and procedures. … the Executive agrees … Read More
From reader Ben King, general counsel of Jive Communications, I learned about a 2016 opinion of the Supreme Court of Utah, Mind & Motion Utah Investments, LLC v. Celtic Bank Corp., 2016 UT 6, 367 P.3d 994 (PDF here). The moral of this particular story is that if you want a contract provision to be interpreted as a condition, you had better make sure it’s worded … Read More
The word workmanlike features in a lot of contracts on EDGAR, particularly loan agreements and landlord-tenant contracts. Here are three random examples: Borrower shall only use contractors … who generally have a good reputation for completing their work in a neat, prompt and workmanlike manner … All Tenant Improvements shall be done at Tenant’s full cost, expense and risk, shall comply … Read More
In MSCD, as well as in this 2007 post, I say that the phrase during the term of this agreement is usually redundant. I use the following example: During the term of this agreement, the [The] Company shall pay Jones an automobile expense allowance of $1,000 per month, grossed up for income tax purposes, and reimburse Jones for all gasoline … Read More
Do you remember be and hereby is? In this 2007 post I dubbed it “the lamest drafting usage.” Well, we now have another contender. I can’t believe I haven’t written about it previously. It’s—drum roll, please—agrees to and does hereby. The lameness is something to behold. What makes it particularly lame? Primarily it’s the doubling up of verb structures to express … Read More
Yes, it’s time to return to the shall wars. Thanks to the article by Lori Johnson that I discuss in this post, I’d now like to consider a court opinion that I overlooked when it first appeared. I’m referring to Lubbock County Water Control & Improvement Dist. v. Church & Akin, L.L.C., 442 S.W.3d 297 (Tex. 2014) (PDF here). The Court Opinion … Read More
As their principal objection to tinkering with mainstream contract language, traditionalists offer the notion of “tested” contract language—mess with the standard formulations and you invite a world of risk into your lives. My objection to that objection has been that it’s mostly offered without any backup. Usually it’s a platitude that’s invoked as a matter of expediency, to rationalize maintaining the status … Read More
Early in the modest tweetstorm caused by last Friday’s post, I saw this tweet by @JEGrant3: Here's the power of an #MVP: @avvo just got @KonciseD to consult on improving their product. For free. #leanstartup https://t.co/FNf4BrOzvA — John E. Grant (@JEGrant3) April 8, 2016 I was mystified. “MVP”? WTF? But @anseljh came to the rescue, explaining that “MVP” stands for … Read More
